IPv6 deployment for hosting and developers: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
* Mail over IPv6 without SPF and DKIM stops delivery to large mail providers (e.g. Google). | * Mail over IPv6 without SPF and DKIM stops delivery to large mail providers (e.g. Google). | ||
* If multiple protocols are available, which should be preferred? Linux seems to go for IPv6 first, but any which prefer IPv4 will never see the v6 service. | * If multiple protocols are available, which should be preferred? Linux seems to go for IPv6 first, but any which prefer IPv4 will never see the v6 service. | ||
[[Category:Talks]] | |||
Revision as of 08:34, 10 September 2020
Talk on the implications of deploying IPv6 for hosting platforms and developers.
Rough notes
- Stats on incoming traffic from hosting providers
- Stats on outgoing traffic from ISPs(?)
- Percentage of sites running IPv6
- Percentage of other services running IPv6
Problems
- Adding AAAA records 'breaks' SSH.
- Mail over IPv6 without SPF and DKIM stops delivery to large mail providers (e.g. Google).
- If multiple protocols are available, which should be preferred? Linux seems to go for IPv6 first, but any which prefer IPv4 will never see the v6 service.