Password cracking: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
* What options does the chosen language support? | * What options does the chosen language support? | ||
* Which options are the most efficient? | * Which options are the most efficient? | ||
Contents of lookup tables: | |||
* Dictionary words | |||
* Common words not in dictionary (e.g. TV shows) | |||
* Simple combinations, such as dictionary word concatenated with '1', '123' etc. | |||
* Every possible combination of case and 0-9a-z from 6-12 characters in length. | |||
== Libraries == | == Libraries == |
Revision as of 17:16, 22 July 2018
Initial steps
Steps required for password cracking software:
- Identify which columns contain the username and the password (hashed or otherwise). May be easier to convert to a standard internal representation before processing.
- Identify the algorithm used.
- Identify whether a salt is used.
From these there are multiple stages:
- If no salt is used (e.g. plain MD5), consult a pre-computed lookup table.
Identifying an algorithm
- Length: 32 characters (16 bytes) is likely to be MD5.
- Characters: 0-9a-zA-Z is likely to be MD5.
Lookup tables
- How should these be delivered? Plain text file, SQLite database, Lightning Memory-Mapped Database (LMDB), something else?
- What options does the chosen language support?
- Which options are the most efficient?
Contents of lookup tables:
- Dictionary words
- Common words not in dictionary (e.g. TV shows)
- Simple combinations, such as dictionary word concatenated with '1', '123' etc.
- Every possible combination of case and 0-9a-z from 6-12 characters in length.
Libraries
Ultimately most libraries end up being a wrapper around OpenSSL.
Python
hashlib
is the Python wrapper around OpenSSL and appears to be in the standard library.